Healthcare

: Specifications : 1 Page , 1 Source , APA Style: run-in Describe `capitation` and how it differs from the `fee for dish up` method of payment . What offend has it had on providers and managed care companiesFee For Service (FFS ) is a finance mechanism in which the persevering pays for the work depending on the amount of function provided and the rate the atomic number 101 has setup . It is the most common set of reimbursing the physician . However , this system has a disadvantage . around physicians may spend minimal time with each persevering br so that they are able consult a greater summate of patients (Drossos 2002Capitation is a method of providing compensation to the physician depending on the health needs of the macrocosm . The compensation is coherent before hand . Depending on age , sex , and mena ge status the amount is calculated . Physicians would be spending some(prenominal) time with each patient , as they are non receiving any(prenominal) incentive to consult a greater numerate of patients . As the health status of the each and every genus Phallus of the population is not pre- sterilised , the physician would be receiving a miscellaneous grasp , containing some(prenominal) healthy and unhealthy patients (Drossos , 2002Studies have shown that both these systems have wedge providers and managed care constitutions in different slipway . In doh the state transformed the means of providing psychic for about 50 of the population from a FFS system to a capitation system . The ruminate showed that there were important effects on the manner in which the services were utilized and also on the psychogenic heath status of the population (Manning , 1994Another study was conducted by Shrank et al (2005 ) to determine the manner in which the statistics changed fo llowing shifty from a FFS to a Capitation f! inancing mechanism in a managed care organization . The study showed that during this shift (that was in 1997 to 1998 , the number of patients seeking cataract surgical procedure had reduced . However , there was no prodigious drop in the number seeking non-cataract surgery .

As cataract is an elective surgery , physicians that are offered better incentives would be playacting more number of such surgeries . However this did not pass by in the case of non-elective surgeries , as the physicians were not provided incentives (Shafrin , 2006ReferencesDrossos , A (2002 , health Economics Analysis : Fee For Service vs Capitation , Retrie ved on July 22 , 2007 , from Alex Drossos .Com netsite HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol /www .alexdrossos .com /downloads /FFSCapitation .pdf http /www .alexdrossos .com /downloads /FFSCapitation .pdfManning , W (1994 , Capitation vs . fee-for-service for mental health services : the Utah Medicaid experience AHSR FHSR Annu support Abstr make , 11 , 108 . HYPERLINK http /gateway .nlm .nih .gov /MeetingAbstracts /1 .html http /gateway .nlm .nih .gov /MeetingAbstracts /1 .htmlShrafin , J (2006 , Fee for service vs . capitation : How pecuniary incentives affect medical service provision , Retrieved on July 22 , 2007 from Healthcare Economist Web site : HYPERLINK http /-economist .com /2006 /12 /04 /fee-for-service-vs-capitatio n-how-financial-incentives-affect-medical-service-provision http /-economist .com /2006 /12 /04 /fee-for-service-vs-capitation -how-financial-incentives-affect-medical-service-provision...If you want to get a ample essay, order it on our website: < a href='http://bestessaycheap.com/'>BestEssayCheap.co! m

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay